Static Route Directory

Global Server Locations and Route Directory

VPNBi offers 240+ routes across 120+ countries. This page highlights representative cities by region and explains IEPL dedicated lines, relay routes, and direct connections, helping you choose an exit based on your destination, network conditions, and application.

NETWORK DIRECTORY 14-Day Money-Back Guarantee
Coverage
120+ Countries
Route Count
240+ Routes
Simultaneous Connections
Unlimited Devices
Connection Protection
Bank-Grade Encryption
Asia-Pacific North America Europe Other Regions

REGION INDEX

Browse Server Routes by Region

The table below shows how routes are distributed across regions. City names indicate available exit locations, while route types describe how the connection path is organized. “Supported” means the route is configured for streaming use cases; content libraries and platform policies change, so actual results at connection time should take priority.

VPNBi Representative Server Route Directory
Country or Region City Route Type Streaming Support
Asia-Pacific
Hong Kong, China Hong Kong IEPL Dedicated Line Supported
Japan Tokyo IEPL Dedicated Line Supported
Japan Osaka Relay Supported
Singapore Singapore IEPL Dedicated Line Supported
South Korea Seoul Relay Supported
Taiwan, China Taipei Relay Supported
Thailand Bangkok Direct Supported
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Direct Supported
Australia Sydney Relay Supported
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL Dedicated Line Supported
United States San Jose Relay Supported
United States Seattle Direct Supported
United States New York Relay Supported
Canada Toronto Relay Supported
Canada Vancouver Direct Supported
Europe
Germany Frankfurt IEPL Dedicated Line Supported
United Kingdom London Relay Supported
France Paris Relay Supported
Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Supported
Finland Helsinki Direct Supported
Other Regions
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Supported
South Africa Johannesburg Direct Supported
Brazil São Paulo Relay Supported
Türkiye Istanbul Direct Supported

ROUTE TYPES

How to Tell Route Types Apart

IEPL dedicated lines, relay routes, and direct connections describe how data is organized between your local network and the exit server. They are not simple quality rankings; the same type can perform differently across regions, carriers, and use cases.

IEPL Dedicated Line

More Concentrated Path Control

IEPL dedicated lines typically connect the entry and exit through cross-border links managed within a more clearly defined scope, with fewer segments traversing the public internet. Their value is not exaggerated peak speed, but fewer detours and uncertain intermediate links. They are often worth trying first when the local network is unstable, public routes are congested in the evening, or a long-running session requires consistent transmission.

Dedicated-line resources generally cost more to build and maintain than ordinary paths, so they are not deployed evenly in every city. First check whether the target region offers a corresponding dedicated line, then decide whether the application actually needs it. If ordinary browsing is already smooth over a relay or direct route, switching to a dedicated line may not produce a noticeable difference. Remote meetings, large-file collaboration, and extended streaming are more likely to benefit from path stability.

Relay Route

Balancing Coverage and Routing

A relay route first sends the connection to a suitable entry point, then transfers it through an intermediate network to an exit in the target region. Its purpose is to avoid unsuitable default routing between the local carrier and a distant data center, allowing the service provider to arrange part of the path more deliberately. Relay routes often cover more cities and make it easier to prepare exits for different access directions.

A relay adds another layer of path organization, so quality cannot be judged by geographic distance alone. The fit between the entry point and local network, the route from the exit to the target service, and the current condition of intermediate links all matter. For everyday access, AI Tools, Streaming, and work across regions, relay routes are a versatile choice that balances coverage and connection quality. If one relay is unsuitable, try another route in the same region before moving to a much farther region.

Direct Route

A Straightforward Structure

A direct route connects the local network to the exit server through public routing without an additional transfer entry point arranged by the service provider. Its structure is clear and coverage can be expanded flexibly, making it suitable when the access direction is clear and the carrier has a good route to the target region. In some distant or less frequently used regions, direct routes can also provide a useful exit option.

Direct performance depends more heavily on the local carrier’s international routing. The same city may perform differently across network environments, and work and home networks may take different paths. Direct does not necessarily mean faster or slower. If pages respond normally, video playback remains stable, and application sessions do not repeatedly disconnect, there is no need to switch routes solely because of the route label. If access is poor, trying a relay or IEPL dedicated line in the same region is usually more effective.

Comparison Criteria IEPL Dedicated Line Relay Direct
Path Organization A more concentrated range of links controlled by the service provider Transferred through an entry point and intermediate network Connects directly to the exit through public routing
Best For Long-running sessions, remote collaboration, extended playback Everyday access, AI Tools, regional content Specific regions with favorable routing conditions
Coverage Profile Focused on commonly used directions More flexible city selection Easy to extend across different regions
Cost Difference Higher link construction and maintenance costs A more balanced investment between resources and coverage A relatively direct path structure
Selection Principle Try first when sustained stability is important A practical starting point for most cross-border access scenarios Keep it when local routing is suitable

USE CASES

Set a Route Selection Order by Use Case

The goal is not to chase a fixed label, but to create a sensible combination of exit region, target service, and local network. The suggestions below start with real use cases while keeping alternative paths in the same region available.

Everyday Browsing

For browsing websites, researching information, and using ordinary online services, start with an exit location that is geographically close. Asian cities such as Hong Kong, Japan, and Singapore are often useful starting points, but the target website’s deployment location still matters most. If pages open normally, login sessions remain stable, and images load continuously, keep using the route without switching frequently.

If one website responds unusually slowly, first check whether it is the only site affected. If other sites work normally, try another city or route type in the same region. If multiple sites are affected, check the client mode, subscription status, and local network. This helps avoid mistaking an application-specific issue for a regional selection problem.

Streaming

For streaming, the content region determines the exit location first. Choose Tokyo or Osaka for Japanese content, and Los Angeles, San Jose, Seattle, or New York for U.S. content. Switch routes before opening the platform, then reopen the application after connecting to avoid conflicts between an old session, cached region data, and the new exit.

Streaming platforms change licensing and access policies, so a supported status in the route table indicates configuration for that use case, not a permanent guarantee for every content library. If the platform opens but playback is unstable, switch within the same region from direct to relay or an IEPL dedicated line. If the home page shows the wrong content region, sign out of the application and clear the old session before reconnecting and testing again.

AI Tools

AI Tools place greater emphasis on session continuity and a consistent exit region. Choose a region where the tool explicitly offers service, and keep the same route during login, conversations, and uploads. Frequent switches between regions may trigger another login and create inconsistent location signals within a web session.

Japan, Singapore, or the United States are reasonable starting points. If the page opens but responses pause, try another path in the same region instead of testing several countries in succession. Browser pages and desktop apps may use different proxy rules; when only one application fails, check whether it actually passes through the client before changing the exit city.

Gaming Connections

For gaming, match the game server’s region rather than the account registration country or the publisher’s headquarters. For Asia-Pacific servers, start with Tokyo, Singapore, or Seoul; for North American servers, choose a western or eastern U.S. exit based on the actual region. Judge the connection during a complete match or sustained session, not only by whether the login page opens.

Some game launchers, update services, and live matches use different connection paths, so the launcher may work while the in-game connection does not. Record the specific stage affected, then try another route in the same region. If the game offers server selection, keeping the client exit and game server in the same region generally makes troubleshooting easier.

Cross-Regional Work

Remote meetings, online documents, code repositories, and enterprise systems often maintain several connections at once and are more sensitive to brief path changes. Prefer a relay or IEPL dedicated line in the target service’s region, and test the connection before starting a meeting or file transfer. Keeping the exit unchanged during work is more important than repeatedly trying different cities.

If an enterprise system restricts login regions, follow your organization’s access policy and choose an exit consistent with your work location or authorized region. If meetings work but the file system does not, test each service separately because they may be deployed in different regions. Breaking the issue down at the application level is usually more accurate than judging the entire route broadly.

SWITCHING METHOD

A Decision Process for Switching Routes

Change only one condition at a time to identify whether the issue comes from the region, path, application, or local network. Randomly switching repeatedly erases useful clues and may leave the application holding old sessions from multiple regions.

Goal

Confirm the Access Target First

Identify the specific website, application, or content region you need to access, and determine whether the issue is a total connection failure, incomplete page loading, interrupted playback, or a login-only problem. Different symptoms call for adjustments at different points.

Region

Then Select the Exit Region

Prefer the region where the target service is located or a nearby region. Once the region is correct, keep it unchanged and compare route types within that region so geographic and path differences are not mixed into the same test.

Path

Try Another Route in the Same Region

Switch from the current route to a relay, direct, or IEPL dedicated line in the same city or region. Reconnect before reopening the target application so the old connection does not continue using the previous exit.

Environment

Cross-Check the Local Network

If several routes in the same region show the same issue, compare another access method where permitted and check whether the client has the latest subscription status. When multiple applications fail at once, investigate the local network and client configuration first.

COVERAGE NOTES

Coverage and Usage Boundaries

The 120+ country / 240+ route figures describe overall coverage and do not mean every country has the same route types. Common regions usually offer more path choices, while other regions focus on providing a clear exit location.

Cities Indicate Exit Locations

The city in a route name indicates where the exit server is located, not the target website’s actual data center. Large services may select different entry points based on the account, cache, DNS resolution, and their own routing, so the exit city is only one factor in route selection.

Types Are Not a Fixed Ranking

IEPL dedicated lines, relay routes, and direct connections address different path issues. Dedicated lines suit directions that need more centralized link management, relays emphasize coverage and route organization, and direct connections depend on public routing conditions. Keep the route that works best in practice.

Application Policies Change

Streaming, AI Tools, and enterprise systems may change regional policies, login rules, and network entry points. Route support status is a screening aid; when one service changes, first try another exit in the same region and rebuild the application session.

Choose Routes per Device

This service supports Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux and allows unlimited devices to connect simultaneously. Different devices can choose regions based on their use case, but keeping the same exit throughout an application session makes it easier to preserve login status and troubleshoot issues.